• Abstract BACKGROUND: Increasing attention is being devoted to cognitive-behavioural measures to improve interventions for chronic pain. OBJECTIVE: To develop an Italian version of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire – Revised (CSQ-R), and to validate it in a study involving 345 Italian subjects with chronic pain.
• The structured questionnaire consisted of four parts: demographic questions, the Negative Acts Questionnaire – Revised, questions on exposure to bullying and/or incivility and policy awareness and use of pathways, and the Ways of Coping Questionnaire.

General description: The coping strategy questionnaire. (CSQ), (Rosenstiel & Keefe ) in its original version consists of 50 items assessing patient self rated. We present a study with the aim of investigating the internal consistency and reliability of a Swedish version of the Coping. Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ). Abstract The COPE ( Carver, Scheier, & Weintraub, 1989 ), an inventory of coping strategies, was revised by modifying one of its subscales and adding seven new ones. Factor analysis of the new questionnaire revealed five dimensions: self-help, approach, accommodation, avoidance, and self-punishment. To measure these dimensions, we constructed a 5-subscale, 40-item revised.

Key references:

Folkman S, Lazarus RS, Gruen RJ, and DeLongis A (1986). “Appraisal, coping, health status, and psychological symptoms.” Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 50(3): 571–579.

Primary use / Purpose:

Background:

The Ways of Coping (Revised) is a 66-item questionnaire containing a wide range of thoughts and acts that people use to deal with the internal and/or external demands of specific stressful encounters. Usually the encounter is described by the subject in an interview or in a brief written description saying who was involved, where it took place and what happened. Sometimes a particular encounter, such as a medical treatment or an academic examination, is selected by the investigator as the focus of the questionnaire. Many investigators have asked if the Ways of Coping can be used to assess coping styles or traits. The measure is not designed for this purpose; it is designed as a process measure. It is possible though to look for consistency (style) across occasions by administering the measure repeatedly and then doing intraindividual analyses. Each administration, however, is focused on coping processes in a particular stressful encounter and not on coping styles or traits. The revised Ways of Coping (Folkman & Lazarus, 1985) differs from the original Ways of Coping Checklist (Folkman & Lazarus, 1980) in several ways. The response format in the original version was Yes/No; on the revised version the subject responds on a 4-point Likert scale (0 = does not apply and/or not used; 3 = used a great deal). Redundant and unclear items were deleted or reworded, and several items, such as prayer, were added.

Psychometrics:

See article: Folkman S, Lazarus RS, Gruen RJ, and DeLongis A (1986). “Appraisal, coping, health status, and psychological symptoms.” Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 50(3): 571–579.

Keywords:

Web link to tool:

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

General description: The coping strategy questionnaire. (CSQ), (Rosenstiel & Keefe ) in its original version consists of 50 items assessing patient self rated. We present a study with the aim of investigating the internal consistency and reliability of a Swedish version of the Coping. Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ). We present a study with the aim of investigating the internal consistency and reliability of a Swedish version of the Coping Strategies.

Coping Strategies Questionnaire-revised

It can be recommended for use in chronic pain research and multidisciplinary pain cpoing. Test-retest reliability was investigated by administering the CSQ-Revised to the same subjects after seven days to avoid the natural fluctuations in symptoms associated with memory effects. Increasing attention is being devoted to cognitive-behavioural measures to improve interventions for chronic pain. Cross-validation of the factor structure of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire.

Stratgeiesstrtaegies exploratory factor analysis of a large sample of subjects with chronic pain suggested a six-factor solution that was relatively supportive of the original scales, and showed satisfactory reliability and construct validity 7.

All of the questions were well accepted. No significant effects were found for any of the subscales Table 3. Most of the a priori hypotheses were confirmed.

Pregare 2324 The Chronic Pain Coping Inventory The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. The item-scale correlations were satisfactory Distraction, 0. The translated versions were submitted to an expert committee of bilingual Italian and English speaking clinicians, methodologists, psychometricians and the translators.

The Coping Strategies Questionnaire CSQ was developed in by Rosenstiel and Keefe 3 using a pool of items reflecting coping strategies frequently reported by patients and deemed to be important cq researchers and clinicians involved in the management qeustionnaire pain.

This item self-report questionnaire asks patients to rate the frequency of their use of coping strategies during the previous week Testing the penultimate version: The difficulties encountered by the translators were overcome by means of careful wording.

The aim of the present study was to describe the cultural adaptation of the CSQ-Revised and its validation in a large sample of subjects with chronic pain to enable its use in Italian-speaking subjects in Italy and abroad. A large sample item level factor analysis. This procedure was performed in questionnire with international guidelines ICC Intraclass correlation coefficient.

Patients who had cwq recent cerebrovascular accidents, myocardial infarctions, or chronic lung or renal diseases were also excluded. There were no problems with regard to comprehension.

Dimensions of pain-related cognitive coping: Telephonefaxe-mail ti. The Italian version was copinv, which has been shown to be reliable and valid Italian validation of the CES-D self-rating scale. This item questionnaire measures the use of strategies for coping with pain by assessing six domains: Catastrofismo 1718192021 The CSQ-Revised also showed satisfactory test-retest reliability in the investigated population and context; however, this psychometric property was not tested in the original and other adapted versions of the CSQ-Revised and, thus, no comparisons are possible.

Consistent with the English findings 8our estimates of construct validity highlighted the questionnaie ie, Distraction, Ignoring pain sensations, Distancing from pain and Coping self-statements and maladaptive properties Catastrophizing and Praying of most of the subscales 47 Prendere le distanze dal dolore 131415 Alternative ways of assessing model fit.

Spine Phila Pa ; Translations of the CSQ have been validated and allow comparisons among different populations and countries 9 — The patients were asked about any problems they encountered and all of the strategiees were checked for missing or multiple responses. Second, the relationships between self-reported beliefs and objective measures of coping, such qquestionnaire behavioural observations or reports of cognitive quesyionnaire during structured or standardized situations, were not considered because only self-administered measures were used.

There was a problem providing the content you requested

Coping Strategies Questionnaire Revised Csq-r

Two translators, whose questionnwire language was Italian, each independently translated the English version into Italian, keeping the language colloquial and compatible with a reading age of 14 years. There were several limitations to the present study. Five factors or fiction? For each subscale, the answers are summed and divided by the number of items for which a response was provided. Author information Copyright and License information Disclaimer.

Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ)

Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, validity and sensitivity to change. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation The questionnaire was translated into Italian using a process of forward-backward translation involving four translators.

Testing Structural Equation Models.

The adapted questionnaire is reproduced in Appendix 1. Cambridge University Press;

Coping Strategies Questionnaire-revised (csq-r) Pdf